Alpine Income Property Trust (NYSE:PINE – Get Free Report) and Xenia Hotels & Resorts (NYSE:XHR – Get Free Report) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.
Insider & Institutional Ownership
60.5% of Alpine Income Property Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.4% of Xenia Hotels & Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Alpine Income Property Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Xenia Hotels & Resorts shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Profitability
This table compares Alpine Income Property Trust and Xenia Hotels & Resorts’ net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
| Net Margins | Return on Equity | Return on Assets | |
| Alpine Income Property Trust | -4.39% | -1.00% | -0.41% |
| Xenia Hotels & Resorts | 5.24% | 4.50% | 1.97% |
Dividends
Earnings and Valuation
This table compares Alpine Income Property Trust and Xenia Hotels & Resorts”s revenue, earnings per share and valuation.
| Gross Revenue | Price/Sales Ratio | Net Income | Earnings Per Share | Price/Earnings Ratio | |
| Alpine Income Property Trust | $60.53 million | 4.96 | -$2.66 million | ($0.23) | -86.57 |
| Xenia Hotels & Resorts | $1.04 billion | 1.47 | $16.14 million | $0.56 | 28.74 |
Xenia Hotels & Resorts has higher revenue and earnings than Alpine Income Property Trust. Alpine Income Property Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xenia Hotels & Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Analyst Recommendations
This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Alpine Income Property Trust and Xenia Hotels & Resorts, as reported by MarketBeat.
| Sell Ratings | Hold Ratings | Buy Ratings | Strong Buy Ratings | Rating Score | |
| Alpine Income Property Trust | 0 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2.89 |
| Xenia Hotels & Resorts | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2.33 |
Alpine Income Property Trust presently has a consensus target price of $19.92, suggesting a potential upside of 0.03%. Xenia Hotels & Resorts has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential downside of 13.01%. Given Alpine Income Property Trust’s stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Alpine Income Property Trust is more favorable than Xenia Hotels & Resorts.
Volatility and Risk
Alpine Income Property Trust has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Xenia Hotels & Resorts has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Summary
Xenia Hotels & Resorts beats Alpine Income Property Trust on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.
About Alpine Income Property Trust
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (NYSE: PINE) is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that seeks to deliver attractive risk-adjusted returns and dependable cash dividends by investing in, owning and operating a portfolio of single tenant net leased properties that are predominately leased to high-quality publicly traded and credit-rated tenants.
About Xenia Hotels & Resorts
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. is a real estate investment trust, which engages in the provision of investment in luxury and upper upscale hotels and resorts. It also owns a diversified portfolio of lodging properties operated by Marriott, Kimpton, Hyatt, Aston, Fairmong, and Loews. The company was founded in 2007 and is headquartered in Orlando, FL.
Receive News & Ratings for Alpine Income Property Trust Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Alpine Income Property Trust and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
