T. Rowe Price Group (NASDAQ:TROW) vs. Hpil (OTCMKTS:HPIL) Financial Review

Hpil (OTCMKTS:HPIL) and T. Rowe Price Group (NASDAQ:TROW) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Hpil and T. Rowe Price Group’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hpil	N/A	N/A	N/A
T. Rowe Price Group	28.89%	19.95%	15.09%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Hpil and T. Rowe Price Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hpil	0	0	0	0	0.00
T. Rowe Price Group	4	12	0	0	1.75

T. Rowe Price Group has a consensus price target of $108.31, suggesting a potential upside of 1.37%. Given T. Rowe Price Group’s stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe T. Rowe Price Group is more favorable than Hpil.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

73.4% of T. Rowe Price Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 84.8% of Hpil shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of T. Rowe Price Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Hpil has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.52, suggesting that its share price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Hpil and T. Rowe Price Group”s top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hpil	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
T. Rowe Price Group	$7.09 billion	3.29	$2.10 billion	$9.18	11.64

T. Rowe Price Group has higher revenue and earnings than Hpil.

Summary

T. Rowe Price Group beats Hpil on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

About Hpil

HPIL Holding, a development stage company, engages in developing technology projects in Canada. It also focuses on developing online and artificial intelligence games; and ZIPPA, a multi-gaming global platform for gamers, as well as powertrain management system. The company was formerly known as Cybernetic Technologies Ltd. and changed its name to HPIL Holding in August 2021. HPIL Holding was incorporated in 2009 and is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

About T. Rowe Price Group

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is a publicly owned investment manager. The firm provides its services to individuals, institutional investors, retirement plans, financial intermediaries, and institutions. It launches and manages equity and fixed income mutual funds. The firm invests in the public equity and fixed income markets across the globe. It employs fundamental and quantitative analysis with a bottom-up approach. The firm utilizes in-house and external research to make its investments. It employs socially responsible investing with a focus on environmental, social, and governance issues. It makes investment in late-stage venture capital transactions and usually invests between $3 million and $5 million. The firm was previously known as T. Rowe Group, Inc. and T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. was founded in 1937 and is based in Baltimore, Maryland, with additional offices in Colorado Springs, Colorado; Owings Mills, Maryland; San Francisco, California; New York, New York; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Tampa, Florida; Toronto, Ontario; Hellerup, Denmark; Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg; Zurich, Switzerland; Dubai, United Arab Emirates; London, United Kingdom; Sydney, New South Wales; Hong Kong; Tokyo, Japan; Singapore; Frankfurt, Shanghai, China; Germany, Madrid, Spain, Milan, Italy, Stockholm, Sweden, Melbourne, Australia, Amsterdam, Netherlands and Washington, DC.