Reviewing Tempo Automation (NASDAQ:TMPO) and Nano Dimension (NASDAQ:NNDM)

Tempo Automation (NASDAQ:TMPO – Get Rating) and Nano Dimension (NASDAQ:NNDM – Get Rating) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Tempo Automation and Nano Dimension, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Tempo Automation	0	1	2	0	2.67
Nano Dimension	0	0	0	0	N/A

Tempo Automation currently has a consensus price target of $3.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1,011.11%. Given Tempo Automation’s higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Tempo Automation is more favorable than Nano Dimension.

Profitability

This table compares Tempo Automation and Nano Dimension’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Tempo Automation	N/A	N/A	-428.46%
Nano Dimension	-521.22%	-18.21%	-17.46%

Risk and Volatility

Tempo Automation has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nano Dimension has a beta of 1.76, suggesting that its share price is 76% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Tempo Automation and Nano Dimension’s top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Tempo Automation	$12.05 million	0.61	-$144.85 million	N/A	N/A
Nano Dimension	$43.63 million	11.49	-$227.42 million	($0.88)	-2.68

Tempo Automation has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Nano Dimension.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

24.3% of Nano Dimension shares are held by institutional investors. 34.2% of Tempo Automation shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Nano Dimension shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Tempo Automation beats Nano Dimension on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

About Tempo Automation

(Get Rating)

Tempo Automation Holdings, Inc. manufactures electronic products. The company designs and assembles printed circuit boards. It serves automotive, aviation and defense, consumer electronics, design firms, energy, industrial technology, medical device, semiconductor, and space industries. The company was founded in 2013 and is based in San Francisco, California.

About Nano Dimension

(Get Rating)

Nano Dimension Ltd., together with its subsidiaries, provides additive electronics in Israel and internationally. The company's flagship product is DragonFly IV system that serves cross-industry High-Performance-Electronic-Devices' fabrication needs by depositing proprietary conductive and dielectric substances, as well as integrates in-situ capacitors, antennas, coils, transformers, and electromechanical components. It also provides nanotechnology based conductive and dielectric inks; and FLIGHT software platform that enables the 3D design of electrical and mechanical features. The company markets and sells products and services to companies that develop products with electronic components, including companies in the defense, automotive, consumer electronics, semiconductor, aerospace, and medical industries, as well as research institutes. Nano Dimension Ltd. was founded in 2012 and is headquartered in Ness Ziona, Israel.