Head to Head Survey: Star Bulk Carriers (NASDAQ:SBLK) and Himalaya Shipping (NYSE:HSHP)

Star Bulk Carriers (NASDAQ:SBLKGet Free Report) and Himalaya Shipping (NYSE:HSHPGet Free Report) are both transportation companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation and dividends.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Star Bulk Carriers and Himalaya Shipping”s top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Star Bulk Carriers $1.04 billion 2.90 $84.17 million $1.25 21.30
Himalaya Shipping $131.90 million 5.17 $17.70 million $0.63 23.20

Star Bulk Carriers has higher revenue and earnings than Himalaya Shipping. Star Bulk Carriers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Himalaya Shipping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Star Bulk Carriers and Himalaya Shipping, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Star Bulk Carriers 0 1 2 1 3.00
Himalaya Shipping 0 1 0 0 2.00

Star Bulk Carriers presently has a consensus price target of $31.50, suggesting a potential upside of 18.29%. Given Star Bulk Carriers’ stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Star Bulk Carriers is more favorable than Himalaya Shipping.

Volatility & Risk

Star Bulk Carriers has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Himalaya Shipping has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

33.9% of Star Bulk Carriers shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.3% of Himalaya Shipping shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Star Bulk Carriers and Himalaya Shipping’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Star Bulk Carriers 13.01% 6.81% 4.36%
Himalaya Shipping 20.28% 18.28% 3.37%

Summary

Star Bulk Carriers beats Himalaya Shipping on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

About Star Bulk Carriers

(Get Free Report)

Star Bulk Carriers Corp., a shipping company, engages in the ocean transportation of dry bulk cargoes worldwide. Its vessels transport a range of bulk commodities, including iron ores, minerals and grains, bauxite, fertilizers, and steel products. As of December 31, 2023, the company owned a fleet of 116 dry bulk vessels with combined carrying capacity of 13.1 million deadweight tonnage (dwt) consisting of Newcastlemax, Capesize, Post Panamax, Kamsarmax, Panamax, Ultramax, and Supramax vessels with carrying capacities between 53,489 dwt and 209,537 dwt. Star Bulk Carriers Corp. was incorporated in 2006 and is based in Marousi, Greece.

About Himalaya Shipping

(Get Free Report)

Himalaya Shipping Ltd. provides dry bulk shipping services worldwide. The company operates a fleet of vessels. It serves major commodity trading, commodity and energy transition, and multi-modal transport companies. Himalaya Shipping Ltd. was incorporated in 2021 and is based in Hamilton, Bermuda.

Receive News & Ratings for Star Bulk Carriers Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Star Bulk Carriers and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.