Thursday, federal prosecutors in New York are planning to meet Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos regarding his allegations that the National Enquirer tried to blackmail him with help a person said.

The billionaire will match with prosecutors from the coming days as part of the inquiry into claims that the government got confidential information that ended up in the possession of the tabloid and hacked his telephone, the person told The Associated Press. The individual wasn’t authorized to explore the assembly and spoke on the condition of anonymity.

The meeting comes after Bezos’ longtime security adviser, Gavin de Becker, wrote in The Daily Beast last month that private investigators had”reasoned with high assurance that the Saudis had access to Bezos’ telephone and obtained confidential info.”

The Enquirer’s parent company, American Media Inc., has had business dealings with Saudi Arabia, but the realm has denied any part in hacking Bezos’ telephone or providing his personal information to the Enquirer. Saudi Arabia’s ministry of state for foreign affairs said lately that the kingdom had”nothing to do with” the issue.

That is something between the 2 parties”

Messages were delivered to AMI seeking comment. A lawyer for the firm has denied that the Enquirer dedicated extortion and defended against the tabloid’s handling of the situation as part of a typical discussion.

Bezos, the world’s richest person, has said that the Enquirer threatened to release explicit photos of him publicly announced the tabloid’s coverage of him wasn’t politically motivated and stopped exploring how it obtained private texts between Bezos and his mistress, former TV anchor Lauren Sanchez.

The Wall Street Journal reported that AMI compensated Sanchez’s brother, Michael Sanchez $200,000, to obtain Bezos’ texts. But Becker suggested the Enquirer had been aware of Bezos’ affair before it ever reached out to Sanchez’s brother, and that the”first data came from different channels.”

De Becker did not clarify what evidence he had backing his assertion that Saudi Arabia obtained access to Bezos’ telephone, saying he could not disclose details of the analysis”to honor officials pursuing this case.”

He explained his query”included a wide variety of resources,” including talks with Saudi dissidents and whistleblowers and”people who know” Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

Bezos’ attorneys had no comment.

When he aired his allegations from the Enquirer in a blog article, Bezos alluded to a potential relationship between AMI and also Saudi Arabia, writing that”the Saudi angle seems to hit a particularly sensitive nerve”

This past year, the tabloid produced a glossy magazine which included 97 webpages saluting Saudi Arabia before bin Salman’s coming in the U.S. on a public relations blitz to market his country.

AMI sent a letter in May stating it had enabled a representative of the Saudi government suggest modifications before it went to press and to review a draft of the magazine. The company said the Saudi crown prince nor his agents had requested to be generated, that no funds was included, and it was made solely according to a business decision.

The letter sought advice on whether AMI’s connection with Saudi Arabia took it to enroll as a foreign agent under U.S. lawenforcement. The Justice Department said that, depending on the info it didn’t.

Throughout the 2016 election, the business aided the presidential effort of Trump by paying $150,000 into Playboy centerfold Karen McDougal for the rights to her story concerning an affair with Trump and then burying the narrative.

The U.S. attorney in New York agreed not to prosecute the company in exchange for its cooperation into an evaluation of Trump’s attorney, Michael Cohen, who pleaded guilty to campaign finance violations and other crimes.

That agreement required the company to violate no laws.